I believe that the most expedient way to begin weening civilization from its voracious appetite for poisonous fossil fuels is to begin using in its place oxyhydrogen gas fuel derived from water. With more then 300 million cubic miles of water on the surface of Earth’s, it is perhaps the most abundant substance on our planet. Water is composed of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen making these gases when produced from the water a highly combustible gas mixture that can be employed as a limitless supply of clean fuel. Better still, the fuel is 100% harmonious with the world’s delicate ecosystems.
The problem at present is that brute force electrolysis technology requires more energy input then is yielded by the derived gases and so water as fuel has not been considered a viable proposition. However, there were two men who (working independently) in the early 1980′s, began exploring exotic means to dissociate the water molecule with very low power input requirements.
The man who first discovered this approach (and patented an apparatus for operating the effect) was Andrija Puharich. Interestingly, at the time Puharich filed his water fuel patent in June of 1981, he lived only a few miles from where I live today. His patent was titled ”A Method and Apparatus for Splitting Water Molecules”, which he was awarded on July 19th, 1983.
The patent may be downloaded from the link below:
http://www.singularics.com/docs/patents/puharich_us4394230.pdf
The key elements of Puharich’s setup are connected in series:
1) some implementation to manage the waveform
2) an isolation transformer
3) an inductor
4) water fuel cell (a capacitor formed from partially insulated nickel plates with water as dielectric)
5) another inductor
Puharich’s water fuel cell (he referred to it as a Thermodynamic Device) was arranged as follows:
Puharich energized his cell with a low frequency AC signal (20Hz – 200Hz) on a higher AC carrier frequency (200Hz – 100,000Hz) producing an amplitude modulated waveform. The specific frequencies are tuned so that the water cell is resonant with the Vss side inductor.
This waveform is rectified by the aqueous bath as the polarity of the water increases over time through the operation of the cell.
Shortly after Puharich was awarded his patent, Stan Meyer began work along similar lines. I do not know for sure whether Meyer began his research after having read Puharich’s patent, but based on the chronology of the patent filing and the similarities in the basic approach, it seems likely that this was the case.
From 1983 until his death in 1998, Meyer was awarded more then 15 patents as he continually improved upon his version of the technology.
The clearest patent he filed on the technology may be downloaded here:
http://www.singularics.com/docs/patents/meyer_us4936961.pdf
As with Puharich, the key elements of Meyer’s setup are connected in series:
1) some implementation to manage the energization waveform
2) an isolation transformer
3) an inductor
4) water fuel cell (a capacitor formed from 304L stainless steel coaxial tubes with water as dielectric)
5) another inductor
6) a “blocking” diode
Meyer’s water fuel cell was arranged as follows:
Meyer energized his cell with two square wave frequencies; a higher frequency which was tuned to bring about electrical resonance between the water cell (a capacitor) and the Vss side inductor and a lower square wave frequency used to gate the resonant frequency at regular intervals. The resulting waveform thus is a train of square pulses followed by a constant off-period.
Below is a diagram showing how Meyer used this waveform to step charge the water cell (capacitor) to such a degree that the water molecules are in a sense “winched” apart by the strong orientation effect of the increasing electrostatic field.
The result is a voltage-only effect that uses strong polarity to weaken and dissolve the covalent bond of the water molecule and thus produces oxygen and hydrogen gas fuel.
Of the two approaches, I believe that Meyer’s is the more succinct path and so I have spent a a good deal of time over the years attempting to replicate his work.
Below are measurements of the capacitance, resistance (and impedance) of the water capacitor in both dry and submerged states at various frequencies. See below:
Below is a picture of the WFC mounted in tap water.
Here is a view of an array of 5 tubes.
(Note: I have not included the CRZ characteristics for the 5 tube array in this article)
In the following test, these frequencies were used.
The input waveform was a DC square wave pulse rising to 8 Volts. The current measured moving through the circuit was 0.05 amps.
The waveform output on the water capacitor looks like this:
Note that the step charges on the water capacitor rose in this test to 715 volts!
With this level of cell performance, I was able make light gas production using no more than 1.5 watts (conservatively) consumed.
The oxyhydrogen gas in the video above is being produced by a voltage-only effect in the water capacitor in just the way that Meyer describes it in his patent.
Here is a blog post of mine about the circuit you can use to achieve this effect:
http://www.alexpetty.com/2011/06/16/simple-wfc-energization-circuit-by-alex-petty/
Here also are a few videos of Stan Meyer discussing his technology at length. I have produced full transcripts of these videos as I believe they really are worth your time and attention.
http://www.alexpetty.com/2011/06/17/stan-meyer-tour-of-water-powered-dune-buggy-from-may-1992/
http://www.alexpetty.com/2011/06/13/stan-meyer-water-as-fuel-lecture-in-denver-on-may-1997/
Several years ago I started a Yahoo Group for the purpose of finding others interested in this line of research and collaborating with them. Ive met some really talented people through the group.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/meyer_wfc_replication
Anyone interested in this technology should consider joining this group.
More to come on this subject as I continue to advance the work.



















Nice overview about this line of research. There is alot of skepticism about HHO by the “trapped inside the box” types, but I think their time is almost up. There are too many experimenters out there pushing the boundaries right now. (even though it takes longer to get things done on a shoestring budget)
You may also want to look into the work of Prof. Kanarev.
I also saw a video about a water powered dodge truck recently – Notice they use the exact same type setup (concentric SS tubes). see link below
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:_Hydrogen_Hog_by_Future_Energy_Concepts%2C_Inc.
You may want to check my article on this stuff out:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Article:Free_Electric_Energy_in_Theory_and_Practice
Hi again Alex,
I was originally brought to your blog by doing some searching for Stan Meyer information. I was curious if there was a reason you chose to go with 304ss rather than 316ss?
Also, are your inner tubes tuned to match your outer tubes? From the pictures it doesn’t look like they are, but I wanted to ask.
Do you have any more information about your circuit used to produce gas in this post? Are you using any gating, or just a square wave pulse from a fuction generator or something? Are you using a function generator, or something that you built yourself (555 timer, etc)?
ty
The following frequencies may or may not help you in your endeavor:
2025 HZ – Proton Precession/Water Resonance [TB]
42800 HZ – Aetheric dissociation/water resonance (water -> aetheric
force) [TB]
From: ["interesting, useful, and weird frequencies"], Terry Bastian [tbastian@dmv.com], from a message in the Keely Net BBS Archives posted in July of 1998 : http://www.keelynet.com/interact/Arc_7_98-12_98/00000221.htm
Either way, keep up the good work!
@Bob
304 is cheaper and in terms of its electrical properties, more or less identical to 316.
vibrational pitch matching for mechanical resonance (ie. organ pipe notching the tubes) is not required for electrical resonance, and i do not believe it is a very large factor in the operation of the technology.
generally, i use signal generators for testing frequency ranges on the bench, and then I use a PIC18 microcontroller chip (which I code in C) to control the circuit once I have locked my operational ranges for a given apparatus.
-alex
[...] atoms being pulled apart in a strong electrostatic field. For more about this see earlier post: http://www.alexpetty.com/2010/09/17/water-as-fuel-with-puharich-and-meyer [...]
[...] http://www.alexpetty.com/2010/09/17/water-as-fuel-with-puharich-and-meyer/ [...]
I think Puharich use 600Hz on 0.1540 molar salt concentration with electrolysis voltage between 2.30V – 2.46V (RMS), with AM modulated carrier wave from 20 to 200Hz and switch polarity on each ~3 second.
[...] http://www.alexpetty.com/2010/09/17/water-as-fuel-with-puharich-and-meyer/ [...]
A great site about free energy is at http://www.universalsymbiosis.org/energy.html which is a non profit foundation that do lots of developing but that page explains free energy potential in clear language. It explains about solar energy, teslas magnifying transmitter and all kinds of free electric energy developments. I read that website often its for sure worth a look.