About 15 years ago an idea struck me which has stayed with me to this day.
It is the idea that the number of points needed for a coordinate system to allow the definition of form across a desired number of dimensions is given by “two to the power of d” where d is the number of dimensions you are interested in working with. See the table below.
table of point count defining dimensional form
So what does this table say? To me it says that the universe increases its expansion into dimensionality by following the expanding and contracting paths on the Vortex Glyph. Two is the factor which allows the Universe to double and halve itself into whatever configuration the Creative will of Mind requires for manifestation
It also shows that in a system operating with zero dimensions, form can not be defined. From the zero dimensional perspective only a single point can be considered. I hear you asking “Can’t we define as many points as we want to anytime we please?”. Yes, of course, but remember that when you do this you are using a coordinate system involving higher dimensions, normally two or three, and that this means you have already moved into a pluralistic mode. To the point a^0, “a” transcends dimensionality. At this “zero point”, the whole of Creation exists without differentiation and nothing exists beyond it. This is another way of expressing the undifferentiated universal Mind, it is another way of expressing the singularity.
To define form in one dimension, it is necessary to define a coordinate system that uses two points as predicted by 2^1 = 2.
To define form in two dimensions, a coordinate system using four points is needed as predicted by 2^2 = 4.
To define form in three dimensions, a coordinate system using eight points is needed as predicted by 2^3 = 8.
form in dimension
It stands to reason that form in four dimensions requires a coordinate system using 16 points (as predicted by 2^4 = 16), as arranged as shown above. I believe a 5th physical dimension would require a 32 point based coordinate system to describe a 5 dimensional form and so on. It also stands to reason that a “hypercube” may require a 4th, 5th and 6th dimension – one parallel dimension to each of the 3 dimensions that we normally experience.
The Zero Dimension Case
“a to the power of zero equals 1″
Anytime the you have “a/a”, it equals one.
Algebraically stated “a/a=1″ can be written “a to the power of 1 times a to power of negative 1″. When you multiply two numbers together exponents are added. In this case these are “+1″ (ie. a/1) and “-1″ (ie. 1/a) and so the result is a^0 (ie. a/a) , which again equals 1.
Said plainly, when you have all the pieces of a pie then you have one whole pie. So then 1/1=1, 2/2=1, 5/5 = 1, 10/10 = 1, 100/100=1 and so on. In a zero dimensional universe, the pie is the universe. It is the universal Mind in stillness, unfettered by the restless force of creative or destructive will and thus in a state of perfect self-unity.
Looking at this from the two dimensional perspective, take a^0 (a to the zero power) and let the value of “a” approach some large value (say 9^9). You will see that it remains forever 1. In other words, when you let “a” dwell on zero, even when you increase its “size” , the universe will always respond, “Sorry, here at zero, all is one: there are no dimensions, there is no distance, there is no time needed for traversing space, etc. There is only unity. There is only oneness. All is one.”
zero dimensional plot of a
Let’s look at this another way. When you evaluate sequential numbers raised to the “power of zero” and then reduce these to mod9 values, the result is the following table.
geometric growth in zero dimensions (2 2 2, 1)
When I look at a table like the one above, I look for two parameters which I have discovered, these are:
1) Growth Signature (GS)
2) Increment Line Sum (ILS)
The Growth Signature (GS) is made up of three numbers which are each MOD9 expressions of the sum of the digits found in columns 1 & 2, 4 & 5 and 7 & 8. Taking the above table as an example, this would be obtained by adding 1+1 from the 1 & 2 columns, 1+1 from the 4 & 5 columns and 1+1 from the 7 & 8 columns giving a GS = 2 2 2. I have found that for all dimensions 2 and higher, GS = ILS in mod9.
The ILS is the sum of all the digits in a given incrementation of 9 stated in MOD9. In this particular case ILS = 1 because 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 = 10 = 1.
The key parameters for this table are 2 2 2, 1. In this table we see that the poles of 3 and 6 are equal to one. Even 9 is equal to 1! The math is saying that all is one at the singularity and that there is no differentiation between the parts of the whole. GS is 2 2 2 and the ILS is 1. The parameters 2 2 2, 1 are unique to zero based “growth”.
One Dimensional Growth
The standard view of 1 dimensional growth is seen below.
one dimensional plot of a
When one evaluates the infinite sequence of numbers raised to the “power of one” and reduces these to mod9 values, the following table is the result.
geometric growth in one dimensions (3 0 6, 0)
In one dimension the universe shows itself (not surprisingly) to be a very linear place which naturally divides itself into 9 parts.
Here the pole at 3 is always equal to 3 and the pole at 6 is always equal to 6. We also see that the pole at 9 is no longer a “physical” part of the system as its value is always zero. In this table GS=3 0 6 and ILS = 0.
Note that in mod9, the ten number sequence we use to calculate the ILS never changes in any increment. The numbers reoccur in every incrementation of nine in exactly the same way for as high as you care to go. The highest incrementation of 9 that I verified was of the order 9 x10^31,000!
Two Dimensional Growth
The standard view of 2 dimensional growth is seen below.
two dimensional plot of a
When one evaluates the infinite sequence of numbers raised to the “power of two” and reduces these to mod9 values, the following table is the result.
geometric growth in two dimensions (5 5 5)
From the second dimension through all higher dimensions, we see that the poles at 3 and 6 as well as 9 will always be equal to zero. We also begin to observe interesting resonances in the channels of contractions and expansion at 124 and 875. Note that “square geometric growth” produces a palindromic sequence of 1 4 7 7 4 1. Note also that the ILS is 24 (or 6) and the GS is 5 5 5 (also 6).
key positions on vortex glyph for 2d geometric growth
Three Dimensional Growth
The standard view of 3 dimensional growth is seen below.
three dimensional plot of a
When one evaluates the infinite sequence of numbers raised to the “power of three” and reduces these to mod9 values, the following table is the result.
geometric growth in three dimensions (0 0 0)
Note that the ILS is 0 and the GS is 0 0 0.
key positions on vortex glyph for 3d geometric growth
I have developed a chart showing the Growth Signatures for 36 dimensions. It is very interesting to see that a pattern arises.
Table of GS and ILS
The Growth Signature pattern is wave-like, with a peak at 0 0 0 and a trough at 2 2 2. It cycles endlessly:
0 0 0 –> 8 8 8 –> 6 03 –> 2 2 2 <– 3 0 6 <– 5 5 5 <– 0 0 0
Also the ILS pattern alternates infinitely between 0 and 6 (the Mind of God and the Negative Pole respectively).
Interesting work however it is not the base of all his subsequent work. I know as much Meyer as anyone and will share some information with you.
The first thing he patented was the mag gas generator – true. Hubbard coil actually worked this way and is the reason the “wire” is so big – it is actually copper tubing.
Kapandazi generator is same – not the copper colored tube in the end of his coil. and Many others used mag gas.
Meyer used heterodyned RF in his first “fracture” generator – note the two diode both pointed at the cell? The resonant charge choke was similar to an electron sump and the reason that electrons had to be consumed there.
Second generation was laser ozone generator (air gas processor) and steam were mixed to form H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide)
All his devices and free energy devices in general use acceleration in the process to convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass.
So really there were three different processes. Thanks for sharing your experiments.
Kapandazi generator is same – note the copper colored tube in the end of his coil. and Many others used mag gas.
The reason Meyer always talked about the “aluminum engine” is aluminum is not corroded by hydrogen peroxide and is in fact the safest storage jar.