Geometric Derivations of the Transcendentals

Over the last few months I have been analyzing the fractal lengths of the sacred geometry in the Vortex Glyph in a search for as many of the number theory transcendentals as I can find . I have discovered that if you are precise to 2 significant digits, you can find the transcendentals in the glyph, however when you take your measurements out to 3 or more significant figures you will discover a lack of precision in the result. So far, I can not find the source of the error. I believe there are two possible explanations:

1) The Vortex Glyph does not relate to the transcendentals of Number Theory

2) There is error associated with 2D planar analysis that can only be accounted for in higher dimensions.

deriving the transcendentals

deriving the transcendentals

Analysis in two dimensional analysis yields a very close approximation of “e” (Euler’s Number to within 0.51% error) and and “Phi” (the Golden Mean to within 0.0006%).

Leave a Reply